My Current Position
After I realized that efforts to stop what Massachusetts was doing was seemingly useless, I moved down to the State of Texas with a reference from Boston University where I had contracted with to work on their FEMA Covid-19 Reimbursements for 6 months. In Texas, in the very first Interview I got the job, and then within 3 weeks of obtaining that Job I was terminated and they made up that I showed up late (the GPS data on my phone shows that I always showed up before 9 a.m. and never once showed up past 9:30 a.m. which is when they said I showed up). Shortly after getting fired, I got another job offer upon the first interview and within 3 weeks I was terminated from that job as well. Their excuse was poor performance, along with conduct issues akin to insubordination (both of which were untrue... I have never been written up once at any place that I worked for any kind of conduct issues). They later tried to challenge my unemployment by submitting false statements and stating that I had to continue to contract with the company I was contracted out of to maintain my unemployment (they didn't show up at the Unemployment hearing because they knew that they would lose because they know what I have for evidence).
I moved to Texas with very little debt hoping that I wouldn't have to much of a problem finding a job along with housing. I was obviously wrong about both of those and was even denied housing because of something that government officials in Massachusetts made up.
I am now more than $25 thousand dollars in debt, and do not believe that it is reasonable that I will be able to find neither a Job that will be able to support my income needs nor housing in the State of Texas without having to face an extraordinary amount of hurdles.
Even if I do find employment in Texas, their is a high likelihood that my employer will do what the previous 2 employers did which is fire me, make up conduct issues and or performance issues, and then try and challenge my unemployment benefits.
I was lied to by a large amount of individual's in Texas about them donating to help me out and they were coming up with illegitimate excuse as to why they won't including that I "won't cover for what their business's were doing in Texas, they asked me to leave out an extraordinary amount of material facts in my case against Massachusetts and Salem including but not limited to "that they used my family", that it's a "Discrimination Case", that they "Dont want people knowing that the State changed a court recording", "That a court order is void", that they don't want people knowing that the state put me in jail for a year (when the state of Massachusetts knew that they couldn't), that a judge entered in a void judgement etc. I was also told that I would be fired when the case made the news and that business's wouldn't hire me unless people donated, and also that I was fired so that at work wouldn't donate (I believe that this was in part my employers motivation for firing me because they didn't want people to get to know who I am because they would of donated, and because Massachusetts wants to paint the picture of what happened to the Media). A lot of people said that they wouldn't look at my website because they would get convicted if they helped the state of Massachusetts because they could of said that they didn't know that Massachusetts was doing/did all of what is on this website.
Extortion under the Hobbs Act and State Law includes Fear of Economic Harm
Essentially these questions need to be answered in the affirmative for them to be guilty of extortion.
1. Did the person who is acused of extortion induce or attempt to induce the victim to give up property or property rights? (property is esentially anything that has value and rights include the right to make business decisions, contracts (engage in employment) and to solicit business free from coercion).
2. Did the defendant use or attempt to use the victim's reasonable fear of physical injury or economic harm in order to induce the victim's consent to give up property?
The term “economic loss” means any pecuniary loss resulting from harm (including the loss of earnings or other benefits related to employment, medical expense loss, replacement services loss, loss due to death, burial costs, and loss of business or employment opportunities) to the extent recovery for such loss is allowed under applicable State law.
3. Was the defendant's actual or threatened use of force, violence or fear wrongful?
Basically did the person accused of extorting use force, violence, or fear in an unlawful manner (e.g. a collection agency calling you to obtain money owed to them for a debt and threatening to send it to a credit reporting agency isn't illegal, but harassing someone in order to try and get money from them that wasn't owed to them would be or communicating actual or threatened harm to an indvidual if they do not give up money).
Case where extortion was found:
When the defendant (perpetrator) caused some businesses to refuse operations with the victim which sufficiently induced the victim's consent to give up property, consisting of a right to contract freely with other businesses, as long as there were other businesses beyond defendants' control with whom the victim could do business.